What is a typical purpose of Radar's "Review" action?

What is a typical purpose of Radar's "Review" action?

• A. To manually approve or reject the payment after review
• B. To automatically deny the payment
• C. To escalate to a refund
• D. To force 3DS on all charges

Answer: (A)

Radar’s Review action is a manual decision point after a charge is flagged by fraud detection. When Radar identifies a potentially risky payment, you can place it in Review so a human reviewer can examine the charge details—risk score, which rules were triggered, device and customer history—and then decide to approve the payment or reject it. This gives you a controlled override option, allowing legitimate orders to go through while still protecting against fraud. It’s not an automatic denial, it doesn’t escalate to a refund, and it doesn’t force 3DS on all charges. Those outcomes come from other Radar or authentication settings, whereas Review is the place for a human verdict on the charge.

Radar’s Review action is a manual decision point after a charge is flagged by fraud detection. When Radar identifies a potentially risky payment, you can place it in Review so a human reviewer can examine the charge details—risk score, which rules were triggered, device and customer history—and then decide to approve the payment or reject it. This gives you a controlled override option, allowing legitimate orders to go through while still protecting against fraud. It’s not an automatic denial, it doesn’t escalate to a refund, and it doesn’t force 3DS on all charges. Those outcomes come from other Radar or authentication settings, whereas Review is the place for a human verdict on the charge.